Is "moderate" really the word?
WASHINGTON, May 9 — Moderate Republicans gave President Bush a blunt warning on his Iraq policy at a private White House meeting this week, telling the president that conditions needed to improve markedly by fall or more Republicans would desert him on the war.
The White House session demonstrated the grave unease many Republicans are feeling about the war, even as they continue to stand with the president against Democratic efforts to force a withdrawal of forces through a spending measure that has been a flash point for weeks.
Participants in the Tuesday meeting between Mr. Bush, senior administration officials and 11 members of a moderate bloc of House Republicans said the lawmakers were unusually candid with the president, telling him that public support for the war was crumbling in their swing districts.
Well boo-friggen hoo! Poor widdle babies!
Grow a f*ckin' backbone, you linguini-spined pantywaists! Our soldiers have enough to deal with with Harry Reid and the rest of the howling surrender monkeys, without having a bunch of limp-wristed cowardly buffoon RINOs adding their surrender calls to the mix!
“I walked away from it feeling I got a chance to make my points,” Mr. Davis said.
The delegation included Representatives Mark Kirk of Illinois, another leader of the moderate coalition; Jim Gerlach of Pennsylvania; James T. Walsh of New York; and Jo Ann Emerson of Missouri. Mr. Kirk, Mr. Walsh and Ms. Emerson declined to discuss the meeting.
A "leader" of the "moderate coalition?"
Something a bit oxymoronic inherent in that phrase, don't you think?Name me a "moderate leader" of anything.
Give me a list of "great moderates" in history.
Unfortunately, I don't have an exhaustive list handy of this "moderate coalition." But if I did, I'd write each of those clowns a letter telling them to get the hell off of our side.
With asshole RINOs like these, who the hell needs democrats?
Bastards.
|