The democrats and the media vs...

As I've stated before, we are in the midst of a liberal media propaganda war, the likes and the level of which harken back to the days of yellow journalism. And this insidious parade of pernicious propaganda continues to roll on in the dead tree media, who remain either oblivious to the fact that the results of their polls are so incredible as to defy belief, or desperate enough to hope that there are enough voters out there who stand to be duped by their dishonesty.

This time, they have Patty Wetterling, who herself conceded that she was too liberal for the tastes of the MN 6th CD (arguably one of the most conservative of Minnesota's congressional districts), predictably (as I related to Jeff Kouba) ahead of Michele Bachmann 48-40.

BvW has some great analysis here, and here. And King also has a good report on the "fair and unbiased" sample from which the poll was taken.

As has been the case in every election season now for the past 30-plus years, it has been the dinosaur media and the Democrats vs. the Republicans.

While it is true that democrats tend to raise less money from a lesser variety of people than do republicans, their lack of fundraising is more than made up through free propaganda and advertising, courtesy of their all-too-willing media shills.

Yet, despite what should be an overwhelming advantage for democrats, they keep on losing.

I wonder why.

You have no doubt heard democrats calling for a "new direction" in the GWOT and in Iraq.

Judging by their abysmal failures in selling their policy initiatives, as evident by their lack of electoral successes in the past 12 years, isn't it time that they heeded their own advice?